Wallace, Updike, Dostoyevsky

Friday March 17th 2006, 3:12 pm

‘Consider the Lobster: And Other Essays,’ by David Foster Wallace - The New York Times Book Review - New York Times

Turning to literature in essays on Kafka, Dostoyevsky and Updike, Wallace employs a largely moral vocabulary to dismiss such older American novelists as Norman Mailer and Philip Roth as “Great Male Narcissists.” For him, Updike is “both chronicler and voice of probably the single most self-absorbed generation since Louis XIV.” In contrast, he is all praise for Dostoyevsky, largely because the Russian writer’s “concern was always what it is to be a human being — that is, how to be an actual person, someone whose life is informed by values and principles, instead of just an especially shrewd kind of self-preserving animal.”

Indeed, reading Dostoyevsky revives Wallace’s old complaint that American writers face an unparalleled difficulty in trying to create a literature informed by ethical values and principles. In an earlier essay titled “E Unibus Pluram: Television and U.S. Fiction,” Wallace claimed that television in its more sophisticated phase had appropriated the “rebellious irony” of the first postmodern writers (Pynchon, Barthelme, Gaddis, Barth), thereby pre-empting and defusing the “critical negation” that was the literary and moral responsibility of his generation of writers. More than a decade later, Wallace remains convinced that “many of the novelists of our own place and time look so thematically shallow and lightweight, so morally impoverished, in comparison to Gogol or Dostoyevsky.”

This is strong stuff — Wallace’s blithely assertive manner helps him cover much rhetorical ground very quickly, even if a firmer belief in understatement might have helped him avoid such unhelpful generalizations as “our present culture is, both developmentally and historically, adolescent.” Given such vehemence, it seems fair to point out that compared with the Russian masters, most novelists of any time or place are likely to look shallow and lightweight. And, at their best, the Great Male Narcissists have appeared to possess the “degrees of passion, conviction and engagement with deep moral issues” that for Wallace distinguish the Russians from contemporary American writers.

Subjects: ,

No Comments

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Who is Eric Rosenfield?
What is Wet Asphalt?
What is The Book: A Novel?
My Notebook
My Resume
My Mailing List
Subscription Feed RSS
Add to Live Journal
The Master Page
Subscription Feed The Master Feed

What I'm Looking At
  • No links

March 2006
« Feb   Apr »



Currently Reading
erosenfield's photos More of erosenfield's photos 1.0
(Dec 31st, 2000 - Jul 16th, 2002) 2.0
(Dec 24th, 2002 - Jul 21st, 2005) version 3.0. Content copyright © Eric Rosenfield under a Creative Commons license except where otherwise noted, or material quoted from other sources under "fair use".
Design and programming by Eric Rosenfield, modified from the Conestoga Street Wordpress Theme by Theron Parlin. Glasses and portrait photos by Philip Sheridan.
Powered by WordPress

Creative Commons License