John Barth and bad reviewing

Monday December 26th 2005, 4:23 pm

The John Barth and bad reviewing

A) Barth can’t “get on” with his stories without the “postmodern soft-shoe routine” because performing such a routine is precisely his way of telling stories. Asking him to lose his “verbal pyrotechnics” and his “sef-consciousness” (”talking about the telling itself,” as Gilsdorf clumsily puts it) is asking him to lose his authorial personality, his reason for telling stories in the first place. If you don’t like Barth’s approach to the writing of fiction–by which everyone has to agree that stories are all made up in the first place and that reflecting on how stories affect us is a satisfactory substitute for the “suspension of disbelief”–the appropriate response would be to read someone else, someone who won’t “frustrate our expectations of conventional narrative,” not to ask Barth to become a different kind of writer.

Subjects: ,

No Comments

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Who is Eric Rosenfield?
What is Wet Asphalt?
What is The Book: A Novel?
My Notebook
My Resume
My Mailing List
Subscription Feed RSS
Add to Live Journal
The Master Page
Subscription Feed The Master Feed

What I'm Looking At
  • No links

December 2005
« Nov   Jan »



Currently Reading
erosenfield's photos More of erosenfield's photos 1.0
(Dec 31st, 2000 - Jul 16th, 2002) 2.0
(Dec 24th, 2002 - Jul 21st, 2005) version 3.0. Content copyright © Eric Rosenfield under a Creative Commons license except where otherwise noted, or material quoted from other sources under "fair use".
Design and programming by Eric Rosenfield, modified from the Conestoga Street Wordpress Theme by Theron Parlin. Glasses and portrait photos by Philip Sheridan.
Powered by WordPress

Creative Commons License